Port Update
author: some of us
Aug 06, 2008 06:09
A summary of the events during the latest port protest.
Its looking like this chapter of port protests has come to an end. This protest proved that we can evolve tactically to meet the needs of a situation. A lot of lasting change will come of this action.
As the 4th Stryker Brigade 2nd Combat Infantry Division returns to Ft. Lewis through the Port of Tacoma, people from throughout the Northwest have taken Direct Action to blockade the paths of these stryker vehicles. 15 arrests so far have been made during blockades attempted at both the Port of Tacoma and Ft. Lewis and in general resistance to the militarization of publicly owned ports and our communities at large.
The intended effect of these demonstrations is to raise the social and economic cost of the war. The excessive security costs caused by the protests cut away at the profits made by accepting military shipments and make ports less likely to accept shipments in the future. After the Port of Olympia demonstrations, the military reimbursed the port for security costs. Steve Hall, City Manager for the City of Olympia, announced after similar protests at the Port of Olympia, that the city would be unprepared to accept another military shipment without calling in the national guard. We are told that these actions taken to blockade military shipments in the North West have inspired others in the anti-war movements across the country take more radical and direct action to have a concrete impact on stopping the war. If so much resistance was shown in every port in the country in response to every military shipment, the war would be impossible to continue.
Demonstrations at the Port of Tacoma began the day the USS Brittin, the boat carrying 900 stryker vehicles, arrived on Tuesday, July 29th. On Thursday, July 31st, there was a march of approximately 40 people into the port. Two women, Kelly Beckham and Kteeo, were arrested. After seeing strykers driving down a nearby cross street and out of the port Beckham and Kteeo took off running to catch up with them. The two women were followed by their fellow demonstrators and about 15 police officers on bikes. The officers beat Beckham and Kteeo to the strikers and formed a line. Beckham and Kteeo along with about 20 other demonstrators stood in front of the line of cops. Beckham was pulled across the police line and arrested. Kteeo was pulled across the police line by her hair, slammed to the ground, lifted up in a head lock then slammed down again. Police then kneeled on her back. This all happened while she loudly repeated "I'm not resisting arrest." Beckham is being charged with obstruction and property destruction. Kteeo is being charged with obstruction and resisting arrest.
Friday night, August 1st, protesters effectively blocked a convoy of military equipment on Freedom Bridge at the 122 exit to a gate into Ft. Lewis, the military base where the strykers were based. Three were arrested during this action, including one person who was arrested for asking an officer what his badge number was. The police were taken by surprise, and soon approximately 20 to 30 police cars arrived from three different departments. Later that night, a truck transporting military equipment was blocked on another bridge at a gate to Ft. Lewis, exit 123. There were 7 people blocking the bridge, with maybe 10 more demonstrating on the sidewalk. 3 were arrested.
August 2nd, late at night, a lock down blocked the main gate of Ft. Lewis, exit 120, stopped a trunk transporting a Stryker vehicle for twenty minutes. Three people were in lockboxes, a device made out of PVC piping and other materials by which they locked their arms to each other. These protesters were removed from the gate and brought to a field. The protesters still refused to move from the devices for another 2 and a half hours. During this time the police attempted a multitude of tactics in attempts to remove the protesters. These included but were not limited to, calling in the fire department to remove the demonstrators from their devices (the department refused to touch the protesters), calling in two specialist (who could not solve the “problem”), googling lockboxes (which yielded no results). After these attempts and two and a half hours, the protesters, hypothermic and hungry, decided to release themselves.
While in jail protester Patti Imani was subjected to discrimination and psychological abuse. The police would begin her booking process, asking her standard questions. When Imani, who is hearing impaired, asked for an ASL interpreter the police would put her into solitary confinement and refuse to continue her booking until she became "more cooperative". Imani was released 15 minutes after the police finished her booking, eight hours after she was originally arrested.
After the blockade was broken, a car full of activists was detained by military police for an hour and a half at the gates of Fort Lewis. There were perhaps three jurisdictions there, including Lakewood Police, Washington State Patrol, and Fort Lewis Police. It seems that while they were turning around, one of the departments ran their license plate and a red flag came up indicating that they were protesters. A lieutenant and sergeant personally supervised the detainment. The five in the car had their information taken down, were told they were would arrested by military police if they ever returned to Fort Lewis, and were given tickets for failure to proof insurance and failure to proof registration. A police dog sniffed their car. An officer, while on the phone, was overheard explaining that a drug dog would help establish probable cause for a full search of the car. They kept refusing a search, and eventually were let go.
This is the first time the port militarization resistance movement actively resisted at a military base. Over the past year since the last port militarization resistance demonstrations at the Port of Tacoma, the police have had time to review and readjust their tactics in dealing with the demonstrators. Taking the resistance to Fort Lewis was in response to the changing tactics of the police. The police were taken by surprise by this change in tactics and venue and were less prepared to respond.
Sunday, August 3rd, demonstrators, knowing that police expected them at night, broke with their pattern and showed up in the middle of the day. 20 people demonstrated for most of the day inside the “free speech zone” designated by the police. In the late afternoon, as people began to leave, there was about 10 to 15 demonstrators left. Two police cars drove into the designated free speech zone. Demonstrators sanding near one of the cars were told by an officer, driving car number 773, that he was going to taser one of them. He brandished his weapon and pointed it at them. There demonstrators were breaking no laws or posing any threat to the officer at the time. The officer turned around towards Forest Student, a demonstrator standing alone several feet away from the police car. Forest Student was tasered twice, once while standing and again after hitting the ground. Student was then arrested for third degree assault, a charge that was then dropped. Eye witness testimony proves Student’s arms were crossed and he was not threatening the officer at all. The officer was sitting in his car at the time and tasered him through the window.
On Monday August 4th 40 people marched down to the port carrying banners and chanting. The group marched down the middle of a major street through the port. Eventually they were pushed to the side walk outside of an entrance to the port. The group waited beside the gate, determined to prevent military equipment from leaving the quay. At one point during the night the Tacoma Police Department walked around behind the group, specifically targeting Joe LaSac, the groups’ only videographer. He was grabbed and arrested for “trespassing.” As demonstrators moved closer to watch the arrest, members of TPD surrounded the group, pointing tasers at them on two sides.
As demonstrators were leaving the port, they were surrounded by police cars. The demonstrators were not able to access their vehicles for a period of time. While the demonstrators attempted to figure out an exit strategy the police turned on their lights and sirens as an intimidation technique. The demonstrators made it out of the port safely.
add a comment on this article
Posted by: sl at Aug 06, 2008 16:05
don't listen to these comments folks, they are posted by police in an attempt to break the morale of the protests...its a sign we are winning not failing
love and solidarity to you all!
Posted by: Tenzing at Aug 06, 2008 19:47
Not only did the police arrest Joe Le Sac, the only videographer present and a consistent thorn in the side of police over several PMR protests because he's exposed police brutality and lies, but they seized his camera and have not returned it, claiming it may have evidence of crimes committed.
Posted by: dick at Aug 06, 2008 19:48
Basically, you accomplished very little. Blocked a few vehicles for a short period of time . . . Wow . . . released yourself from your lockboxes, a tactic that did appear to at least take up police resources, because you were cold and hungry . . . what discipline! What fervor! But I'm sure you feel very very proud of yourself, as I can see from all the self-congratulatory posts. Oh, and good job changing tactics. You really threw the cops for a loop. Whatever.
Posted by: Wimpy at Aug 06, 2008 22:33
"After these attempts and two and a half hours, the protesters, hypothermic and hungry, decided to release themselves."
Hypothermic? Really? The low temperature for August 2 at Fort Lewis was recorded as 53 degrees. What amazing fortitude to withstand such brutal conditions. This proves once again that it's all about the drama and never about reality or the truth. You truly are delusional, both about your goals and your progress toward them. We stopped one truck for a few minutes. Hurray! If we stopped every truck at every base we could stop the war! What a delusional extrapolation. Some day you will understand that everyone else is laughing at you.
Posted by: Rocky at Aug 07, 2008 00:12
Usually occurs at 30-50, but can happen at higher temperatures--especially when there is lack of motion, wind, precipitation, etc. See
http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/forestry/searchandrescue/hypthm.aspx for a rough overview.
People have developed hypothermia from extended exposure to water at 70 degrees. It's perfectly legit for people sitting on the ground for two hours in 53-degree weather in the absence of sunlight to become cold enough that it is a health risk. The ground is also much denser than air and will sap the heat from people's bodies much quicker. Ask any woofer if you don't believe me.
Posted by: bert at Aug 07, 2008 02:23
here's the link:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rwhitlock/sets/72157606561556753/
Posted by: coldcamper at Aug 07, 2008 05:29
Yeah, me and many other people I've known have spent hours lying on the prone in 30-50 degree weather, in clothing wet from sweat, on cold and wet ground. How to defeat hypothermia in those situations: change out of wet t-shirts, socks, etc, and add a layer of clothing. It's all about two things: planning ahead for the weather and a little bit of intestinal fortitude. Maybe you're a little short in those departments?
Posted by: airgeek at Aug 07, 2008 21:04
I'm not a cop, and I'm not a protester, and I think this is all a bit silly. It's like the old guy in the minivan at Critical Mass that got freaked out and ran up on someone's bike, only to have 10 people yell "Assault with a deadly weapon!" Next you'll be getting mad at the clouds for blocking the sun.
Posted by: Patty Imani at Aug 08, 2008 11:46
During my booking process I explained I was partially deaf following the "any medical conditions" question. I found I was unable to hear questions an added interviewer was presenting me with (she spoke softly and sat in the dark, five feet to my right and two feet above where I stood. I was unable to read her lips, see her expressions, or hear her voice)Those with hearing loss understand that many factors affect our ability to interpret words. A third interrogator insisted I was not complying in not answering the question where upon I explained, again, that I was partially deaf and needed the interviewer to stand where I could see her and clearly project her voice to accomodate my hearing loss. A third woman standing next to me yelled into my ear "You Hear Me!" where upon I signed using English Spoken-ASL "My ears are broken, I need you to stand in front of me and speak loudly" At that point I was told "You're not Complying, We don't do sign language here (in this jail)" and I was placed me in an isolation tank for 8 hours). I was denied phone call and other rights as they insisted they had not finished the booking process (though I had provided all legal information necessary to be processed by that point).
Second clarification: I, being a part of the lock down on Sat./Sun. grew neither hypothermic or hungry. Rather, I was growing tired of police shenanigans and wished to support the other members of my action team,
one being a bit cold from the morning mist, one who questioned if the intent of our action (the block of war machinery used in war crimes, which ended hours before) was not simply waining. I personally was quite content with this opportunity to lay upon Mother Earth and look upon the stars, not far from the place I was born (Madigan) and the place where my father's body and mother's ashes lay. I also felt it was within goal to continue the lock down given happenstance costs and the opportunity this brought to communicate with a soldier who was present and seemed grateful that we at least were doing something, where others do little if nothing. This was very meaningful to me and I ask that others who do not resist not question the integrity of those who do. I understand some wish only to spread misinformation to undermine the potential of a growing resistance. Most can see through the ill intentions of those who comment here anonymously who wish only to encourage destructive, or simply mean, thought in others.
Posted by: Jane Cutter, ANSWER Seattle at Aug 09, 2008 00:21
Patti raises a really good point about hearing impairments, which is that under normal/optimal conditions, people with impaired hearing are often able to use a variety of strategies to understand spoken communications--lip-reading, understanding the context, other visual cues, combined with whatever hearing you might have. So a lot of people with hearing impairments are "invisibly disabled" in that you might not know about it unless he or she tells you.
Under stressful conditions, where your words might be used against you in a court of law, you would want to make sure you understood questions being asked. the jailers were without a doubt failing to comply with a reasonable request for accommodation--the first request being to simply move into the light and speak a little louder. The abusive, ignorant and prejudiced response, to shout in Patti's ear resulted in a second reasonable request for an interpreter.
A jail, for better or for worse is a public accommodation. As such, it is required under the Americans with Disabilities Act to provide reasonable accommodations to people with disabilities including but not limited to hearing impairment.
Posted by: ((( i ))) at Aug 12, 2008 21:29
The camera was seized because it probably 'did show crimes on it' ... and the crimes were probably the "police them selves."
If they view the footage and then don't arrest the criminals on the tape (themselves)and then keep the evidence from seeing the daylight of justice ...it would seem they are committing a crime of obstructing justice.
If any footage shows police acting criminal they should have to use the law "on them selves" or be part of a cover-up.
I hope the video guy gets a good lawyer and wins lots of money from this type of harrasment of the media and obstructing justice and all kids of constitutional violations.
((( i )))