Newsfeed

rss/rdf

Get Involved

donate
volunteer

Search



email this article

Media wages Propoganda for BUSH CHENEY NUKE IRAN PLAN

author: Allwhocare
May 22, 2006 22:36

A story that is now retracted, and found launched by Iranianian dissidents in Canada, that Iran made a law that Jews and Christians have to wear identification tags is widely circulating the News.
Report of the retraction was even posted at Hareetz today. Yet it is inciting hate around the country.
WHY?

The more fear is created the more the military can justify it's premeptive wars,

Read America Betrayed
Excerpt from America Betrayed, Assassins

Joseph, R.

America Betrayed, R. Joseph — 1st ed.

Includes Extensive Footnotes & References

ISBN 0971644578




Since 1996, the task of the CIA to coopt the mass media has

been made much simpler. Less than two dozen corporations now

control or own over 90% of the nearly 10,000 newspapers, maga-

zines, and radio and TV stations in America (18).

18). Ben Bagdikian, "The Media Monopoly." 2000; see also: http://

www.corporations.org/media/

Controlling the media is a classic Nazi tactic.

"Propaganda"

Hitler once said, "is the most effective form of terrorism."


 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/05/339728.shtml............
FOUR TRAITORs, The DEVIL is in the Details! IMPEACH!!!!

Summary first, very detailed, takes a few moments to load because of length. Excellent videos and links. More on SARAH McCLENDON's Famous Quote of George Bush Senior , Sarah, if the American people had ever known the truth about what we Bushes have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched."

 http://www.ifamericansknew.org/media/erasevideo.html............

AP Erases Video of Israeli
Soldier Shooting Palestinian Boy


When the 6th edition of The Media Monopoly was published in 2000, the number had fallen to six. Since then, there have been more mergers and the scope has expanded to include new media like the Internet market. More than 1 in 4 Internet users in the U.S. now log in with AOL Time-Warner, the world's largest media corporation.
In 2004, Bagdikian's revised and expanded book, The New Media Monopoly, shows that only 5 huge corporations -- Time Warner, Disney, Murdoch's News Corporation, Bertelsmann of Germany, and Viacom (formerly CBS) -- now control most of the media industry in the U.S. General Electric's NBC is a close sixth.


Excerpts from America Betrayed, Assassins



Since 1996, the task of the CIA to coopt the mass media has

been made much simpler. Less than two dozen corporations now

control or own over 90% of the nearly 10,000 newspapers, maga-

zines, and radio and TV stations in America (18).

18). Ben Bagdikian, "The Media Monopoly." 2000; see also: http://

www.corporations.org/media/

Controlling the media is a classic Nazi tactic. "Propaganda"

Hitler once said, "is the most effective form of terrorism."

Despite the efforts of the Ford-Rockefeller White House, the

Senate and House each established their own Select Committee on

Intelligence Activities, chaired by Frank Church and Otis Pike (re-

spectively). Rockefeller, with the assistance of Kissinger, Rumsfeld,

and Dick Cheney, began obstructing Senate and House inquir-

ies, particularly those which in any way concerned the training and

employment of CIA assassination teams (10,15,19) or terrorist at-

tack squads, such as Operation Gladio.(

The Pike Committee finally issued a contempt of Congress

citation against Henry Kissinger for his refusal to provide

Despite the efforts of the Ford-Rockefeller White House, the

Senate and House each established their own Select Committee on

Intelligence Activities, chaired by Frank Church and Otis Pike (re-

spectively). Rockefeller, with the assistance of Kissinger, Rumsfeld,

and Dick Cheney, began obstructing Senate and House inquir-

ies, particularly those which in any way concerned the training and

employment of CIA assassination teams (10,15,19) or terrorist at-

tack squads, such as Operation Gladio.



The Pike Committee finally issued a contempt of Congress

citation against Henry Kissinger for his refusal to provide

THE CIA-CONTROLLED MEDIA: PROPAGANDA AS

TERROR

178

In 1974, there were only the grossest hints as to the CIA's

involvement in assassinations, torture, mind-control







experiments,

and the manipulation of the media. It was to be the job of

Rockefeller, as well as Rumsfeld and Cheney, to cover all tracks

and to stop any House or Senate investigation, or at least throw it

off the track (15).

179

For example, there

is only a brief mention of "Operation Stay Behind" within the

Church reports (Pike's report being suppressed). Operation Stay

Behind was a CIA terrorist operation aimed at the citizens and poli-

ticians of European countries and their democratically elected lead-

ers (20).

According to the 1976 Senate report on the CIA by the Church

Committee, this program was first conceived by the US Joint Chiefs

of Staff was staffed and funded by the CIA, and put into operation

in 1948 by the National Security Council.

Essentially, the CIA was using Nazis, Neo-Nazis, SS-offic-

ers, and CIA-trained terrorists to indiscriminately murder Euro-

pean men, women and children, and to assassinate or otherwise

remove or eliminate communist, socialist, and left-wing politicians.

In Italy, this program was referred to as "Operation Gladio

33). Operation Gladio had engaged in a reign of terrorist bombings

across the country that left at least thousands injured and dead. The bombings

were blamed on the extreme left as part of a strategy to mold public opinion

to the idea of an alternative government taking power by force. The Gladio

personnel created a parallel government called P2 (Propaganda Duo), a neo-

Nazi secret society composed of most of the country's top industrialists, bank-

ers, and diplomats. P2 had close connections with the CIA and carried out

drug smuggling missions and assassinations for them. PT not only infiltrated

the Red Brigades but took over the organization, and carried out the murder

of Aldo Moro in 1978. Colonel Oswald Le Winter of the CIA, who served as

U.S. liaison officer with Gladio, has stated that the planning staff of the Red

Brigades was made up of CIA intelligence agents. Gladio carried out the

1980 bomb attack on Bologna Railway station in which 85 people were killed

and hundreds injured. Subsequent investigation led to the exposure of much

of the conspiracy and in consequence, the CIA arranged for P2's Grandmas-

ter, fascist Lucio Gelli to escape to Argentina.

America Betrayed

ply as "Agent Zero" described how [ex-Swedish Prime Minister Olaf] Palme

had been caught in a deal between the CIA and Iran to release American

hostages in Tehran. 'Palme was a fly in the ointment so we got P2 to rub him

out," the agent said. The second programme, which showed the gaunt silhou-

ette of 'Agent Zero One', alleged that P2 was not wound up in the mid-1980s,

after the arrest of its leader Licio Gelli. "It still exists. It calls itself P7," he

said. According to the agent, the lodge is still functioning with branches in

Austria, Switzerland and East Germany. 'Zero One' has now been revealed

by the Italian press to be Dick Brenneke, allegedly a career CIA officer"

(Richard Bassett, Times, 24/7/90). "In the programme, Mr. Brenneke alleged

that, throughout the 1970's the CIA had made large sums of money available

to the subversive Masonic Lodge, P2, widely believed to have been involved

in the August, 1980 Bologna train station bombing in which 85 people were

killed. Furthermore Mr. Brenneke claimed that, not only does the CIA con-

tinue to secretly finance a revived P2, but that it was involved in the 1986

killing of the Swedish Prime Minister, Mr. Olaf Palme. According to Mr.

Brenneke, P2, under the guidance of its Grand master, Mr. Licio Gelli, used

some of the finance made available by the CIA to set up agencies in West

Germany, Austria and Switzerland. These agencies in turn were used by P2

to set up the assassination of Mr. Palme, on the orders of the CIA. Finally,

and perhaps most sensationally, Mr. Brenneke alleged that President Bush,

then director of the CIA, not only knew about these CIA activities in Italy

(during the late 1970s and early 1980s) but was in fact one of the master-

minds behind them. In the 1976 general election, the huge success of the

Communist Party...encouraged some to believe that Italy might be close to

voting in its first ever Communist government. In order to forestall this pos-

sibility, the CIA allegedly sponsored a series of right wing terrorist attacks,

via Mr. Gelli's P2...The CIA denied the charges and said Mr. Branneke had

never worked for the agency" (Paddy Agnew, Irish Times, 7/24/90). "In a

four part special on RAI, the main Italian state-run television network,

Brenneke claimed he had been making payments to members of P2, a right-

wing Masonic lodge, on behalf of the CIA from l969 to 1980. He said he had

made payments which ranged from $lm to $10m a month and were part of

the struggle against communism. He said P2 was also involved in arms and

drugs trafficking for the CIA...The programme sparked a political storm in

Italy...However a note of caution....Earlier this year he was put on trial in

Oregon for allegedly lying under oath about his claims that Bush traveled to

Paris in 1980 to make a deal with the Iranians over the American hostages.

Brenneke was acquitted on all charges"(Mark Hosenball, Sunday Times, 7/

29/90).

(which means "sword"). In Austria it was named "Schwert"

("sword"). In France it was called "Glaive" ("sword"). It was called

"Operation Sheepskin" in Greece. "Sveaborg" in Sweden. In Bel-

gium, Operation Stay Behind had the name: "SDR-8." Likewise,

in Switzerland it was given an alpha-numerical name: "P26."

America Betrayed

economy "scream" in Chile prior to the overthrow of Allende, now Angola

was the target. The collapse of the Portuguese regime, and the subsequent

likelihood of her African colonies gaining independence and control over

their own destiny, was an anathema to the Wall Street elite. This led to a

decision to fund a civil war in Angola, and to install a Wall Street-friendly

military dictatorship rather than allow elections which might lead to "leftist"

regimes gaining power. However, in December, 1975 the Clark Amendment

was passed by the Senate, which explicitly cut off US funding and banning

CIA operations for the military actions in Angola which had erupted in civil

war with the end of Portuguese colonial rule. Nevertheless, even after the

Clark Amendment became law on February 9, 1976, Bush defied the law and

directed the CIA to continue providing planeloads of weapons and to make

large cash payoffs to pro-western terrorist factions who were murdering, tor-

turing, starving, and terrorizing the men, women, and children of Angola.

However, as this had to be done covertly and secretly, the CIA and Republi-

can leadership controlling the U.S. government sought to use two "surro-

gates" Britain and South Africa, to provide soldiers to fight Wall Street's war

by proxy.

Regardless of country, Operation Stay Behind was run by

the CIA and British Intelligence under the umbrella of NATO, and

involved the use of snipers, police officers, and para-military units

to kill people at random and to conduct brutal raids on supermar-

kets, theaters, and other public places (21-28). In one series of at-

tacks, in Brussels in the mid 1980's, 28 people were murdered while

shopping at local supermarkets. Again, the purpose of these attacks

was to strengthen the hand of right-wing governments and to pre-

vent left-wing governments or politicians from coming to power.

It was the duty of Bush, Kissinger, Rockefeller, Cheney, and

Rumsfeld, to try to cover up these crimes. Indeed Rumsfeld (the

Secretary of Defense when the U.S. was attacked on 9/11) had served

as U.S. Ambassador to NATO in Brussels, Belgium in 1973 and

1974--when some of the worst atrocities were taking place-- and

thus had a special personal interest in preventing any damaging dis-

closures.

Operation Sword ("Gladio/Schwert/Glaive, etc.") was an out-

growth of Dulles' "Operation Stay Behind." Initially, this program

served to recruit high ranking Nazis and SS Gestapo agents into the

OSS and the CIA after the close of WWII. By 1952, Dulles and his

CIA had created a secret guerrilla terrorist army whose primary mis-

sion was terrorism and assassination--often of random targets who

might be murdered by snipers, as they shopped or walked down the

street. Dulles believed that through random acts of terror, left-wing

governments could be overthrown, or prevented from ever coming

to power if the blame for those terrorist acts could be placed on left-

ists (20). Right wing governments are always the beneficiaries of

terrorism.

Operation Sword was first put into operation in Italy, in 1947.

Italian citizens were gunned down by snipers, trains were derailed,

and buildings and planes were blown up by CIA-Nazi agents, and

then blamed on "communists." The purpose of this terrorist cam-

paign was to prevent a communist electoral victory in the 1947 Ital-

ian elections.

.

These and other acts of random terror (Operation Stay Be-

hind), although directed by the CIA (in conjunction with British In-

telligence) were administered under the protective umbrella of the

Clandestine Co-ordinating Committee at the Supreme Headquarters

Allied Powers Europe "SHAPE" (22). SHAPE would later became

the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).

Although these CIA-terrorist cells were spread all over Eu-

rope, the training bases were located in Germany, Italy and France.

Likewise, these terrorist operations were directed and funded by CIA

agents working in the US Embassies in Rome, Paris, and Berlin.

These same CIA agents not only controlled these terrorists cells, but

had infiltrated and often directed the Intelligence services of these

and other countries (23).

In other words, the purpose of Operation Gladio was to use

terror and murder not to combat any external threat, but to combat

internal threats by using terrorism. However, the targets of these

terrorist acts would not be opposition politicians per se, but rather,

the citizens of the state.

Gladio also served as a useful weapon to keep the Italian elec-

torate under control. Citizens would be shot and killed by snipers,

they and their families might be blown up while strolling down the

street. No one was safe. Even police were targeted (28).

Rember the Malvo shootings?

"Mr. George Bush of the CIA" (6) had been a CIA agent

since at least 1960. In all likelihood, he never ceased to be a mem-

ber of this Nazi-like terrorist organization, even while serving

as a congressman or chairman of the Republican Party.

In the 1960s and 1970s, George Bush, and the CIA, were

dedicated to serving their own financial, personal, and political

interests as well as those of the Wall Street elite. Of course, they

did so in the name of "national security." Ostensibly, their goal the

reason they authorized the murder of innocent men, women, and

children, was to fight communism.

George H.W. Bush was rejected yet again. The people and

the Republican party refused him the Republican nomination for

President. Bush was rejected not just because Ronald Reagan was

the superior man and the superior candidate, but also because of

the persistent questions about slush funds, illegal activities,

coverups, and his role in the "Trilateral Commission" (39)

On February 7, 1980 Reagan gave a speech in which he

pointed out that Bush was a member of the Trilateral Commission,

which, according to Reagan, "had led to a softening on defense."

George Bush, Reagan pointed out, believed that making money by

doing business with the enemies of America was more important

than defending America. Bush, he implied believed that business

and commerce "should transcend, perhaps, the national defense."

Bush would betray America, Reagan implied, because money

was more important to Bush than principles, honesty, or our na-

tional security.

The Reagan camp also began running political ads, one of

which showed a drawing of Bush juxtaposed above a headline which

read in part: "A coalition of multinational corporate executives,

big-city bankers, and hungry power brokers... want to give you

George Bush... their purpose is to control the American govern-

ment."

Reagan got the nomination, and Bush, with the help of his

Wall Street, CIA, Skull and Bones network, began working full tilt

on Reagan's entourage to convince them that having Bush on the

ticket would help elect Reagan. Reagan, however, did not like and

did not trust George Bush. In the days just before the Republican

convention, Reagan is quoted as saying: "I want to be very frank

with you. I have strong reservations about George Bush. I'm con-

cerned about turning the country over to him."

Reagan didn't just distrust him, he thought Bush was an ef-

feminate "wimp."

Finally, at the very last minute, despite Reagan's distrust and

scorn, Bush became his running mate.

In November of 1980, Reagan won the Presidency in a land-

slide. Bush was sworn in as vice-president of the United States on

January 20.



59).Wall Street Journal, "Vetting the Frontrunners: From Oil to Base-

ball to the Governor's Mansion," 9/28/1999; Jonathan Beaty & S.C. Gwynne,

"The Outlaw Bank: A Wild Ride Into the Secret Heart of BCCI," Random

House, 1993; James H. Hatfield, "Fortunate Son," St. Martins Press; Arthur

Frederick Ide, et al., "Bush in business with bin Laden. Jihad, Mujahideen,

Taliban, Osama bin Laden, George W. Bush & Oil: A Study in the Evolution

of Terrorism & Islam," Liberal Press, 2002.





So according to America Betrayed, the CIA under George W Bush engaged in terrorism in order to stop communism and promote him to the Presidency. Assination attemps are mentioned, against Ford, Regean as not coincidences. Haven't read it all but the CIA is too damn powerful, and Congress if it has the BALLS must investigate the accusations of its drug dealings to finance itself, the use of funds to bribe Congressmen, and question it's operation in the USA. These are the killers of our Bill of Rights!
Do i doubt Regean was right in his assesment of Bush in the above excerpt>
"On February 7, 1980 Reagan gave a speech in which he

pointed out that Bush was a member of the Trilateral Commission,

which, according to Reagan, "had led to a softening on defense."

George Bush, Reagan pointed out, believed that making money by

doing business with the enemies of America was more important

than defending America. Bush, he implied believed that business

and commerce "should transcend, perhaps, the national defense."

Bush would betray America, Reagan implied, because money

was more important to Bush than principles, honesty, or our na-

tional security."

The link to the story of AP erases video has been censored:
You have Corporations in alliance with the Military, and anything unfavorable to the CFR is removed.
America Betrayed

...Bush, bin Laden, 9-11...

then Prime Minister under King Saud (2).

The huge surge in the price of oil following the 1973 Arab-

Israeli war, made not just oil companies, but the royal family of

Saudi Arabia incredibly wealthy. Faisal and over fifty of the patri-

archs became billionaires (19). By the mid-1990s, over 680 billion

dollars of Saudi money would be invested in the U.S. economy.

Faisal was dedicated to serving the Wahhabi ideals, and this,

he believed could be best achieved by forming alliances with the

rulers and the up and coming leaders of other countries, such as the

United States (20). Faisal knew that the road to success was paved

with gold, black gold (19), and that most men, no matter how "hon-

orable" or "distinguished" had a price and could thus be bought

and sold like whores. Faisal began buying friends and influence in

America and elsewhere, "friends" who could be counted on for

assistance or to look the other way.

The Bush family, with their outstretched hands, eagerly

stepped up to the plate.

This incredible wealth also meant huge amounts of money

were now available to fund Wahhabi missionary movements and

Wahhabi centers of learning throughout the Muslim world.

Millions of dollars were spent on developing Islamic col-

leges and seminaries throughout the Islamic world as well as in the

Americas and the European states. The Wahhabis began support-

ing Islamist fundamentalist movements in Egypt, Pakistan, Afghani-

stan, Iraq, the central Asian states of the Soviet Union

(Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, and Uzbekistan), West-

ern China, Malaysia, Indonesia, East Africa, and within the grow-

ing Muslim communities of Europe, Britain, and the Americas

(3,5,20).

The Saudis also had the wealth to export their brand of Sunni

Islam to other parts of the world through murder and terror.

Wahhabism would be spread by the sword (3,5,20).

Terror, of course, had long been an instrument of the CIA

and a succession of U.S. governments and Presidents. Insofar as

their goals were congruent and compatible, the Saudis and the CIA,

the oil companies, and the Wall Street elite, were happy to partner

together in murder, terror and crime.

This partnership, which has its roots firmly entrenched in

Nazi Germany, was given renewed emphasis when Khalid bin Abdul

Aziz (King Khalid) became the fourth King of Saudi Arabia, reign-

ing from 1975 to 1982. King Khalid, however, had a serious heart

condition, and he was assisted in these Wahhabi-related endeavors

by Fahd bin Abdul Aziz who, in 1982, became King Fahd, "Custo-

dian of the Two Holy Mosques" (2).

It was during the co-reign of these two monarchs, that the

bin Ladens became business partners with the Bush family. The

Bush clan also forged relations with other Saudi families who would

later play a significant role in financing and aiding the 9/11 terror-

ist attack on America.

BUSH-LADENS

With the election of Jimmy Carter, in 1976, George H. W.

Bush (the director of the CIA) would soon be out of a job. George

H.W. Bush, immediately began scouring the country, and other

nations, for financial and other support, as he intended to run for

the presidency in 1980.

That same year (1976), CIA director Bush personally re-

cruited James R. Bath into the CIA (21). According to Bath busi-

ness associate Charles W. "Bill" White: "Bath told me that he was

in the CIA. He told me he was recruited by George H. W. Bush

himself in 1976."

James R. Bath, CIA operative, and friend of the Bush family,

"was named a trustee for Sheik Salem bin Laden of Saudi Arabia.

Bath’s job was to handle all of bin Laden’s North American invest-

ments and operations" (22).

James Bath also had the good fortune to become the repre-

sentative of yet another rich and influential Saudi family, that of

Khalid bin Mahfouz, the brother-in-law of Osama bin Laden (23).

Investing in the family of a man who might soon be presi-

dent, made good business sense to the bin Ladens and other Sau-

dis, and James R. Bath, invested $50,000 in the younger Bush’s

first company, Arbusto Energy, even though it was nearly bankrupt

with no hope of making a buck (23,24). These and other funds

were provided by the bin Ladens and the Mahfouz families. In-

deed, "most of Bath’s investments....were really fronts for Mahfouz

and other Saudis connected with the Bank of Credit and Commerce

(BCCI)" (24) as well as the bin Ladens (22).

James R. Bath was well connected to and trusted by the Bush

family, having served not only as a CIA-operative, but in the Texas

Air National Guard with George W. Bush (23). This friendship

was apparently maintained during those periods when George W.

was constantly drunk, snorting cocaine, as well as AWOL from his

unit (25).

Over the next two decades the Bush family would continue to

sell themselves to the Saudis and bin Ladens. Indeed, one he became

vice-president and then President, an assortment of Saudi terrorists,

crooks, gangsters and murderers eagerly lined up buy influence and

to invest in the Bush family during the 1980s and beyond (21-25,26).

For example, Bin Laden brother-in-law, Sheik Mahfouz, the

NCB banker for Saudi billionaire financier Abdullah Bakhsh (and

David Edwards—a close friend of Bill Clinton who was also repre-

senting Bakhsh’s U.S. interests), arranged for Bakhsh to purchase

17% of another Bush company, Harken Energy, in 1987 (26). Harken

was struggling with debt, and like Arbusto before it, was in danger

of going bankrupt.

Bush, in a deal that has been described as classic, illegal, "in-

sider trading," dumped most of his stock before it tanked (27). Bush,

and his Harken Energy company were desperately in need of a cash,

and the Saudis stepped up to the plate and pitched him $25 million

(26).

Talet Othman, a Palestinian representative of Bakhsh was also

given a seat on Harken’s board of directors whose members included

George W. Bush—the son of vice president, soon to be President

George H.W. Bush.

It was soon thereafter that George W. Bush’s nearly bankrupt

Harken Energy, was given a drilling contract with Bahrain. Money

began pouring in (25,26).

The Saudis bought more than board membership, but a seat at

President George H. W. Bush’s White House foreign policy table

(23,26). In exchange for bailing out his son, George H.W. Bush also

sold these men the right to help determine U.S. foreign policy.

In 1990, Othman, acting as a representative of Mahfouz,

Bakhsh, and the Saudi royal family) along with 15 other Saudis,

began attending White House meetings with the President George



 http://brainmind.com/AmericaBetrayedBushLaden.pdfH.W. Bush and National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft, to dis-

cuss not only Middle East policy, but Iraq (23,25). Three of these

meetings took place during the period just before and after Iraq in-

vaded Kuwait.

Although Saddam Hussein didn’t know it, the Saudis and the

Bush men were plotting the demise of Iraq as an independent nation.

 http://brainmind.com/AmericaBetrayedBushLaden.pdf

That changed in 1938, when huge deposits of oil were dis-

covered beneath the ground. Ibn Saud was to become rich beyond

his dreams, and his dreams included the Wahhabism ideal of a su-

per-Islamic state that encompassed Iraq and the southern states of

the Soviet Union (3,5).

Others too, shared some of those dreams, including Adolf

Hitler, and the Rockefellers and their associates such as Prescott

Bush and the Harrimans. The future director of the CIA, Allen

Dulles, who worked as a lawyer for Prescott Bush, the Rockefellers,

and Harrimans, and assisted them in establishing and covering up

their extensive business partnerships with the Nazis (11), went to

work establishing several interlocking financial networks between

IG Farben, Rockefeller’s Standard Oil and the ruling family of Saudi

Arabia, the House of Saud. Dulles played a significant role in the

formation of the Arabian-American Oil Company (ARAMCO), the

principle American partners of which were Standard Oil, Mobile,

and Texaco (12).

That changed in 1938, when huge deposits of oil were dis-

covered beneath the ground. Ibn Saud was to become rich beyond

his dreams, and his dreams included the Wahhabism ideal of a su-

per-Islamic state that encompassed Iraq and the southern states of

the Soviet Union (3,5).

Others too, shared some of those dreams, including Adolf

Hitler, and the Rockefellers and their associates such as Prescott

Bush and the Harrimans. The future director of the CIA, Allen

Dulles, who worked as a lawyer for Prescott Bush, the Rockefellers,

and Harrimans, and assisted them in establishing and covering up

their extensive business partnerships with the Nazis (11), went to

work establishing several interlocking financial networks between

IG Farben, Rockefeller’s Standard Oil and the ruling family of Saudi

Arabia, the House of Saud. Dulles played a significant role in the

formation of the Arabian-American Oil Company (ARAMCO), the

principle American partners of which were Standard Oil, Mobile,

and Texaco (12).

al., (see chapter 3), who in turn, would go into business with the

Saud family, thus creating an international axis joining Nazi Ger-

many with Saudi Arabia, and Bush, Rockefeller, and thus big oil.

Indeed, all had their eyes on the same prize:

"Our intelligence sources believe that the most important

event of this period was the alliance between American oil compa-

nies and Saudi Arabia. It was the indispensable precondition for

the war and the Nazi holocaust" (16).

The Nazis wanted oil, sought world domination, and sup-

ported mass extermination and terrorism. Standard oil wanted oil

and funneled money to Himmler’s SS and supported terrorism

(Chapter 2). And the Wahhabis, like the Nazis, were seeking world

domination through mass conversion to Sunni-Wahhabism, and

failing that, the mass extermination of those who resisted (3,5).

And all had their eyes on the oil-rich southern Caucuses, the Caspian

basin, and the southern Asian underbelly of the Sovet Union.

Thus, in the 1930s and continuing into the 1940s, the royal

family of Saudi Arabia, Bush and associates, the CIA, and Ameri-

can Oil formed an unholy alliance with a terrorist (Nazi) regime

(11,17), and part of the mix was the bin Laden family (13).

 http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=6626a0fa-99de-4f1e-aebe-bb91af82abb3
Experts say report of badges for Jews in Iran is untrue



View Larger Image
A yellow badge worn by Jews in Nazi Germany during the 1940s.(MICHAEL KAPPELER/AFP/Getty Images)



Article Tools




Printer friendly

E-mail

Font:
*
*
*
*

Chris Wattie, National Post
Published: Friday, May 19, 2006
Several experts are casting doubt on reports that Iran had passed a law requiring the country’s Jews and other religious minorities to wear coloured badges identifying them as non-Muslims.
The Iranian embassy in Otttawa also denied the Iranian government had passed such a law.

A news story and column by Iranian-born analyst Amir Taheri in yesterday’s National Post reported that the Iranian parliament had passed a sweeping new law this week outlining proper dress for Iran’s majority Muslims, including an order for Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians to wear special strips of cloth.

According to the reports, Jews were to wear yellow cloth strips, called zonnar, while Christians were to wear red and Zoroastrians blue.

The Simon Wiesenthal Centre and Iranian expatriates living in Canada had confirmed that the order had been passed, although it still had to be approved by Iran’s “Supreme Guide” Ali Khamenehi before being put into effect.

Hormoz Ghahremani, a spokesman for the Iranian Embassy in Ottawa, said in an e-mail to the Post yesterday that, “We wish to categorically reject the news item.

“These kinds of slanderous accusations are part of a smear campaign against Iran by vested interests, which needs to be denounced at every step.”

Sam Kermanian, of the U.S.-based Iranian-American Jewish Federation, said in an interview from Los Angeles that he had contacted members of the Jewish community in Iran — including the lone Jewish member of the Iranian parliament — and they denied any such measure was in place.

Mr. Kermanian said the subject of “what to do with religious minorities” came up during debates leading up to the passing of the dress code law.

“It is possible that some ideas might have been thrown around,” he said. “But to the best of my knowledge the final version of the law does not demand any identifying marks by the religious minority groups.”

Ali Reza Nourizadeh, an Iranian commentator on political affairs in London, suggested that the requirements for badges or insignia for religious minorities was part of a “secondary motion” introduced in parliament, addressing the changes specific to the attire of people of various religious backgrounds.

Mr. Nourizadeh said that motion was very minor and was far from being passed into law.

That account could not be confirmed.

Meir Javdanfar, an Israeli expert on Iran and the Middle East who was born and raised in Tehran, said yesterday that he was unable to find any evidence that such a law had been passed.

“None of my sources in Iran have heard of this,” he said. “I don’t know where this comes from.”

Mr. Javdanfar said that not all clauses of the law had been passed through the parliament and said the requirement that Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians wear special insignia might be part of an older version of the Islamic dress law, which was first written two years ago.

“In any case, there is no way that they could have forced Iranian Jews to wear this,” he added. “The Iranian people would never stand for it.”

However, Mr. Kermanian added that Jews in Iran still face widespread, systematic discrimination. “For example if they sell food they have to identify themselves and their shops as non-Muslim,” he said.

Rabbi Marvin Hier, the dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Centre in Los Angeles, acknowledged that he did not have independent confirmation of the requirement for Jews to wear badges, but said he still believes it was passed.

“We know that the national uniform law was passed and that certain colours were selected for Jews and other minorities,” he said. “[But] if the Iranian government is going to pass such a law then they are not likely to be forthcoming about what they are doing.”

Stephen Harper, the Prime Minister, said yesterday that Iran is “very capable” of enacting such a law but could not confirm reports that members of religious minorities must wear identifiable markers on their clothing.

“Unfortunately we’ve seen enough already from the Iranian regime to suggest that it is very capable of this kind of action,” Mr. Harper said. “It boggles the mind that any regime on the face of the earth would want to do anything that would remind people of Nazi Germany.”
National Post, with files from Allan Woods, CanWest News Service

 http://www.ifamericansknew.org/media/erasevideo.html

AP Erases Video of Israeli
Soldier Shooting Palestinian Boy This story who personally viewed a reporter destroy the video he took of a boy being shot by Israeli police has now been censored, not found.

WHY?


 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/05/339728.shtml
FOUR TRAITORs, The DEVIL is in the Details! IMPEACH!!!!

Summary first, very detailed, takes a few moments to load because of length. Excellent videos and links. More on SARAH McCLENDON's Famous Quote of George Bush Senior , Sarah, if the American people had ever known the truth about what we Bushes have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched."

FOUR TRAITORs, The DEVIL is in the Details! IMPEACH!!!!
author: ALLWHOCARE
see summary in article below
SUMMARY:
 http://seattle.indymedia.org/en/2006/05/253152.shtml (DETAILS)
Four Traitors: The Devil is in the Details! Impeach

Martha Stewart got jail time for insider trading.
Cheney sold his Halliburton Stock while he knew the Dresser purchase carried asbestos liability and the Halliburton stocks would plunge,(all others who owned it at that time, including pension plans lost big time)
and he wasn't charged with inside trading,

Instead he was able to be appointed by the Supreme Court as VICE president,after Delay's cronies stopped the count in brother Jeb Bush's Florida, and as present commander in chief that day in the underground bunker, leader of multiple drills were going on in a simulation of planes attacking buildings, to confuse ground workers on 911, even though Condolesa Rice, who had to be evacuated from a G8 summit in Italy to aircraft carriers because of threats to attack hotels with airplanes months earlier, said "who would ever dream anyone would use jet liners as weapons, Cheney had plans with PNAC for the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq way before 911,and in Rebuilding America's defenses it was said a New Pearl Harbor was needed. Bush had told Paul O'Neill, economy chief who quit, he wanted to finish Sadamn two years before 911.

Rumsfeld at the Pentagon screamed there are absolutely no survivors...
and couldn't account for the missing
defense money....4.5 Trillion dollars couldn't be accounted for by Dov Zacheim as Payroll keeper at Pentagon...
He called it a "Hot handle...." and laughed.

Chertoff,dual Israeli American, deported the Dancing Israelis who later were found to be Mossad agents who failed 7 lie detector tests, and Covered up Bush's financial ties to the Bin Laden family, and actually let a financier of Bin Laden walk. Contributed to writing the Patriot Act, the worst assault on the Bill of Rights ever, married to Julie L.Myers. She was made head of
Immigration And Customs Enforcement Bureau at the Department of Homeland Security.
She's Chertoff's wife. Nice . She is also the niece of former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Richard B. Myers. Now Bush is talking about building an Israeli fence on the border. Why not alligators rounded up from Florida, sent on Flooded New Orleans busses and dumped into the Rio Grande. A Border plan with teeth!

Now the National Guard will be sent to the border, but not to Guard, detain, or arrest illegals, but to answer phones, without ammunition.

Chertoff not aware citizens were dying at the Convention Center in New Orleans , even though CNN was broadcasting it, sends Blackwater killer mercenaries to New Orleans.


Several people were warned not to fly 911, only three Israeli citizens died at the WTC not the hundred forty plus Bush claimed in the State of the Union, thanks to Odigo, And top WTC VIPS were invited to a bash in Colorado that day by Warren Buffet, place where Bush was finally taken... from the school photo op.

Larry Silverstein who admitted pulling WTC 7, forty seven story WTC 7, 2 years later on a documentary, wins insurance on WTC but wants two payments because there were two planes, Everything there was pulverized to dust but not Atta's visa, cancer killing dust for which hero WTC rescuer James Zagruda's daughter still is not collecting his full pension, nor were his medical bills paid for.

Halliburton wins no bid contract in Iraq, and the contract to build concentration camps in America.

Bush family admits criminal behavior:
What part of "if the American people had ever known the truth of what we Bush's have done to this nation, we would be chased down the streets and lynched" don't you understand?



Of course, would anyone, Mr. Snow, dare comment about Mr. Ex President Bush's statement
Famous Quote of George Bush Senior:" You can fool some of the people all the time, and these are the ones you want to concentrate on"
I also remember he said "Sarah, if the American people had ever known the truth about what we Bushes have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched."

George Bush Senior speaking in an interview with
Sarah McClendon in December 1992

Because they in the oath of Skull and Bones swear allegiance to the world's elite getting richer, at any cost.

Including allowing a porous border for 5 years after 911, which
the final 911 investigation team recommended immediately sealed, the first pick Bush made, Henry Kissinger not being acceptable.
Yes Bush's first pick to head an investigation, same one wanted for war crimes by international court, same who said:


"It is not a matter of what is true that counts, but a matter of what is perceived to be true." -- Henry Kissinger



"Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy." Henry Kissinger, quoted by Bob Woodward in The Final Days, 1976




"Today Americans would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will pledge with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by their world government."

-- Henry Kissinger, from his grand finale address at the Bilderberger meeting at Evian, France, 21 May 1992

Individuals who knew beforehand the deep financial liabilities of their holdings, and profited greatly from the 911 attack
Cheney
Bush Family
Silverstein
Peterson, Blackstone Mortgage holder on WTC, and Council of Foreign Relations.




These are the reasons why America is

no longer in favor of the leaders who have miserably failed us.

LIES ,Preemptive war, NO COMPASSION, DECEIT, TREASON!
DETAILS
Four Traitors: The Devil is in the Details! Impeach



add a comment on this article

Comments
ERASED STORY OF AP
Posted by: Allwhocare at May 22, 2006 22:51

 http://www.ifamericansknew.org/www.ifamericansknew.org



Overview

Media Report Cards
Censorship
Media Bias
Popular Culture
Q & Clues
Daily News


Contact Us
Donate

New Additions
Books & Resources
Email List
Site Map
Search

Print Article
Email this Page

Bias and Distorted Media Coverage
AP Erases Video of Israeli
Soldier Shooting Palestinian Boy
Stonewalls Queries during
“Sunshine Week: Your Right to Know”
Alison Weir
If Americans Knew
Also in Counter Punch
March 17, 2006

“The trend toward secrecy is the greatest threat to democracy.”

- Associated Press CEO, in a speech about the importance of openness

“The official response is we decline to respond.”

- Associated Press Director of Media Relations, replying to questions about AP

In the midst of journalism’s “Sunshine Week” – during which the Associated Press and other news organizations are valiantly proclaiming the public’s “right to know” – AP insists on conducting its own activities in the dark, and refuses to answer even the simplest questions about its system of international news reporting.


Footage of this boy being intentionally shot by an Israeli soldier was erased by the Associated Press. Photo: Reuters


Most of all, it refuses to explain why it erased footage of an Israeli soldier intentionally shooting a Palestinian boy.

AP, according to its website, is the world’s oldest and largest news organization. It is the behemoth of news reporting, providing what its editors determine is the news to a billion people each day. Through its feeds to thousands of newspapers, radio and television stations, AP is a major determinant in what Americans read, hear and see – and what they don’t.

What they don’t is profoundly important. I investigated one such omission when I was in the Palestinian Territories last year working on a documentary with my colleague (and daughter), who was filming our interviews.

Former journalist Alison Weir is Executive Director of If Americans Knew, which is currently conducting a statistical analysis of AP's coverage of Israel-Palestine, to be released within a few months. The organization has created cards that describe AP actions for people to disseminate in their communities.

On Oct. 17, 2004 Israeli military forces invaded Balata, a dense, poverty-stricken community deep in Palestine’s West Bank (Israel frequently invades this area and others). According to witnesses, the vehicles stayed for about twenty minutes, the military asserting its power over the Palestinian population. The witnesses state that there was no Palestinian resistance – no “clash,” no “crossfire.” At one point, after most of the vehicles had finally driven away, an Israeli soldier stuck his gun out of his armored vehicle, aimed at a pre-pubescent boy nearby, and pulled the trigger.

We went to the hospital and interviewed the boy, Ahmad, his doctors, family, and others. Ahmad had bandages around his lower abdomen, where surgeons had operated on his bladder. He said he was afraid of Israeli soldiers, and pulled up his pants leg to show where he had been shot previously.

In the hospital there was a second boy, this one with a shattered femur; and a third boy, this one in critical condition with a bullet hole in his lung. A fourth boy, not a patient, was visiting a friend. He showed us a scarred lip and missing teeth from when Israeli soldiers had shot him in the mouth.

This was not an unusual situation. When I had visited Palestinian hospitals on a previous trip, I had seen many such victims; some with worse injuries. Yet, very few Americans know this is going on. AP’s actions in regard to Ahmad’s shooting may explain why.

We discovered that an AP cameraman had filmed the entire incident. This cameraman had then followed what apparently is the usual routine. He sent his video – an extremely valuable commodity, since it contained documentary evidence of a war crime – to the AP control bureau for the region. This bureau is in Israel.

What happened next is unfathomable. Did AP broadcast it? No. Did AP place the video in safe-keeping, available for an investigation of this crime? No.

According to its cameraman, AP erased it.

We were astounded. We traveled to AP’s control bureau in Israel. With our own video camera out and running, we asked bureau chief Steve Gutkin about this incident. Was the information we had been told correct, or did he have a different version? Did the bureau have the video, or had they indeed erased it. If so, why?

Gutkin, repeatedly looking at the camera and visibly flustered, told us that AP did not allow its journalists to give interviews. He told us that all questions must go to Corporate Communications, located in New York. He explained that they were on deadline and couldn’t talk. I said I understood deadline pressure, and sat down to wait until they were done. When he called Israeli police to arrest us, we left.

Back in the US later, I phoned Corporate Communications and reached Director of Media Relations Jack Stokes, AP’s public relations spokesman. I had conversed with Stokes before.

Over the past several years I have noticed disturbing flaws in AP coverage of Israel-Palestine: newsworthy stories not being covered, reports sent to international newspapers but not to American ones, stories omitting or misreporting significant facts, critical sentences being removed from updated reports.

I would phone AP with the appropriate correction or news alert. One time this resulted in a flawed news story being slightly corrected in updates. In a few cases stories were then covered that had been neglected. In many cases, however, I was told that I needed to speak to Corporate Communications. I would phone Corporate Communications, leave a message, and wait for a response. Most often, none came.

Several times, however, I was able to have long conversations with AP spokesman Stokes. None of these conversations, however, ever ended with AP taking any action. Some typical responses:

The omitted story was “not newsworthy.”
The story deemed by AP editors to be newsworthy to the rest of the world – e.g. Israel’s brutal imprisonment of over 300 Palestinian youths – was not newsworthy in the US (Israel’s major ally).
Burying a report of Israeli forces shooting a four-year-old Palestinian girl in the mouth was justified.
Misreporting an incident in which an Israeli officer riddled a 13-year-old girl at close range with bullets was unimportant.
Despite this unresponsive pattern, when I learned firsthand of an AP bureau erasing footage of an atrocity, I again phoned Corporate Communications. I no longer had much expectation that AP would take any corrective action, but I did expect to receive some information. I gave spokesperson Stokes the numerous details about this incident that we had gathered on the scene and asked him the same questions I had asked Gutkin. He said he would look into this and get back to me.

After several days he had not gotten back to me, so I again phoned him. He said that he had looked into this incident, and that AP had determined that this was “an internal matter” and that they would give no response.

While I should have known better, I was again astounded. AP was blatantly violating fundamental journalistic norms of ethical behavior, and clearly felt it had the power to get away with it.

Journalism, according to the Statement of Principles of the American Society of Newspaper Editors, is a “sacred trust.” It is the bulwark of a free society and is so essential to the functioning of a democracy that our forefathers affirmed its primacy in the very first amendment of the Bill of Rights.

According to the Society of Professional Journalists, one of the four major pillars of journalistic ethics is to “Be Accountable.” According to the SPJ’s Code of Ethics:

“Journalists are accountable to their readers, listeners, viewers and each other.

“Journalists should:

Clarify and explain news coverage and invite dialogue with the public over journalistic conduct.
Encourage the public to voice grievances against the news media.
Admit mistakes and correct them promptly.
Expose unethical practices of journalists and the news media.
Abide by the same high standards to which they hold others.”
Finally, this week, on deadline with a chapter about media coverage of Israel-Palestine, I again tried to confirm some of my facts with AP. Certainly, I felt, during “Sunshine Week” AP would respond. As part of the Sunshine campaign, AP’s CEO and President Tom Curley is traveling the country giving speeches on the necessity of transparency and accountability (for government) and emphasizing “the openness that effective democracy requires.”

“The trend toward secrecy,” AP's President has correctly been pointing out, “is the greatest threat to democracy.”

I emailed my questions to AP, talked to Stokes by phone, and again was told he would get back to me. Again, I got back to him. Then, in a surreal exchange, he conveyed AP’s reply: “The official response is we decline to respond.” As I asked question after question, many as simple as a confirmation of the number of bureaus AP has in Israel-Palestine, the response was silence or a repetition of: “The official response is we decline to respond.”

The next day I tried phoning AP’s President Curley directly. I was unable to reach him, since he was on the road giving his Sunshine Week speeches (“Secrecy,” Curley says, “is for losers”), but I left a message for him with an assistant. She said someone would respond.

I am still waiting.

It is clearly time to go to AP’s superiors. The fact is, AP is a cooperative. It is not owned by Corporate Communications spokespeople or by its CEO or even by its board of directors. It is owned by the thousands of newspapers and broadcast stations around the United States that use AP reports. These newspapers, radio and television stations are the true directors of AP, and bear the responsibility for its coverage.

In the end, it appears, the only way that Americans will receive full, unbiased reporting from AP on Israel-Palestine will be when these member-owners demand such coverage from their employees in the Middle East and in New York. As long as AP’s owners remain too busy or too negligent to ensure the quality and accuracy of their Israel-Palestine coverage, the handful of people within AP who are distorting its news reporting on this tragic, life-and-death, globally destabilizing issue will quite likely continue to do so.

In the final analysis, therefore, it is up to us – members of the public – to step in. Everyone who believes that Americans have the right and the need to receive full, undistorted information on all issues, including Israel-Palestine, must take action. We must require our news media to fulfill their profoundly important obligation, and we must ourselves distribute the critical information our media are leaving out.

If we don’t take action, no one else will.

AP can be reached at 212-621-1500.

Can you help?
Posted by: Allwhocare at May 22, 2006 23:07

 http://www.barrychamish.com/html/barry-chamish-escapes-death.htm
Sherman Skolnick is now gone and Barry may be next.

I surely hope not as Barry has been a true resister of the Order's NWO
centered in Israel. I have benefited greatly from his many works.

Please send this around!

Google stops Iran "Hate speeach"
Posted by: All who care at May 23, 2006 01:13

 http://seattle.indymedia.org/en/2006/05/253181.shtml...
Media wages Propoganda for BUSH CHENEY NUKE IRAN PLAN

 http://www.worldnetdaily.com/...
Google dumps news sites
that criticize radical Islam
Search giant axes another news page,
calls terrorism discussion 'hate content'
 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2006/05/21/rupture-in-the-gop-top-c_n_21377.html?p=20#comments

Thanks Google!